Alice is studying practical and theoretical magic at the University of Cambridge. Her thesis adviser, an extremely esteemed professor Jacob Grimes, who has been known to overwork his students to the point of quitting their studies, is blown to (very small) bits due to a spell gone wrong. Actually, it was Alice’s fault, as she was the one who created the carefully constructed chalk drawings needed for the magic. As she was overworked, stressed, and sleep-deprived, she made a tiny mistake that spoiled the spell her professor was casting.
So, she has a bad conscience. And of course, more importantly, she needs the professor to be able to finish her studies and to secure a good tenure from a well-established university. And she has some other plans, more revenge-oriented, also. So, she has researched a way to get to hell and the afterlife. She has read her Dante and all available other accounts of hell, but as they don’t really agree on most things, she doesn’t really know what to expect. And cost IS pretty high - half of her lifetime, but as life without tenure at a high-class university isn’t worth anything anyway, she draws the needed pentagrams and is ready to leave.
At the last moment, another student, Peter, who has always been her worst and best competitor, arrives and steps inside the pentagram to go to hell with her. He is another student of the same professor, and it turns out that he has had similar plans. Could they together find the professor? At what level of hell would he be? What is his worst sin?
As hell appears different for everyone, they see hell mostly as a kind of collage. The final level is filing your dissertation, which must be perfect, with no room for improvement. And if it fails, there will be no reason given for the failure; you just must simply create it again, this time perfectly…no matter how much time it will take. The ultimate goal of hell is to bathe in the water of the river Styx, lose your memories, and be ready for rebirth. Practically all the damned could take the bath anytime, but they don’t have the will for it.
Alice and Peter search for Jabob with little success while they encounter dangers and even some helpful beings, some of whom might have their own agendas. Their relationship and past are slowly revealed through flashbacks, and they learn something from each other – and even more about their connection. Perhaps there is something more important to be discovered during their journey than a dead, sociopathic professor with a tendency to steal the work done by his assistants.
A clever book filled with references to philosophy and game theory mathematics, which sometimes require googling. At the same time, a love story where two protagonists grow as people. The writing is excellent, the characters are well developed (except perhaps the professor, who felt like a caricature, but he was mostly seen from the point of view of students he treated very badly). The critique of the university world, and especially the postgraduate work, is also very good and even biting. This book was clearly better than Babel by the same author. And as that book was unfairly excluded from the Hugo awards, this will most likely be the next winner, partly as a sort of payback but also because of the sheer quality of the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment